21104.jpg
20 Seiten, PDF-E-Book
Erschienen: März 2009
Bestell-Nr.: 21104
abonnieren
Brigid Nossal
Kooperation in der Beratung: eine unmögliche Aufgabe? (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 11-30
Sofortdownload
Dies ist ein E-Book. Unsere E-Books sind mit einem personalisierten Wasserzeichen versehen,
jedoch frei von weiteren technischen Schutzmaßnahmen (»DRM«).
Erfahren Sie hier mehr zu den Datei-Formaten.
Der Beitrag basiert auf den Ergebnissen der eigenen Dissertation (2007), in der die Erfahrungen mit der Arbeit mit dem systemisch psychodynamischen Ansatz aus Sicht australischer Organisationsberater untersucht wurden. Die Studie umfasste 20 Berater, die mit diesem Ansatz arbeiteten. Die Untersuchung deckte einen beunruhigenden Widerspruch auf: Während 18 der 20 Organisationsberater deutlich auf die Notwendigkeit hinwiesen, im Rahmen des systemisch psychodynamischen Ansatzes mit Kollegen als Paar oder in Teams zusammenzuarbeiten, arbeiteten zum Zeitpunkt der Untersuchung doch alle allein, und nur drei hatten die Absicht, in Kürze mit anderen zusammen zu arbeiten. Damit veränderte sich der Fokus der Untersuchung dahin, diesem Widerspruch zwischen der »best practice« und der tatsächlichen Praxis nachzugehen und letztere zum eigentlichen Gegenstand der Analyse der Forschungsergebnisse zu machen.
Abstract:
This paper is based upon the findings from my Phd Research completed in 2007. The research project was designed to explore and describe the experience of working with a systems psychodynamic approach from the consultants’ perspectives within the Australian context. To this end, 20 consultants who self-selected as working with a systems psychodynamic approach were involved. While the first intention of the research was to document the unique aspects of this approach, the findings uncovered a disturbing contradiction. 18 of 20 consultants strongly asserted the importance of working with colleagues in pairs or teams when adopting a systems psychodynamic approach. However, at the time of interviewing, all 20 consultants were working alone and only three had immediate plans to work with others. An exploration of the reasons for this gap between beliefs about best practice and actual practice became the focus for the analysis of the research data. What is discovered through this analysis is that the reasons why consultants are predominantly choosing to work alone are likely to be complex and irreducible. An exploration of the issues that working together can surface for consultants who apply a systems psychodynamic approach is presented under four sub-topics: system domain issues; theory-related issues; interpersonal issues and intrapsychic issues. In this detailed analysis, what is revealed is an absence of »good enough« containment for the anxieties that are likely to be aroused when consultants work together. To this end, four »containers « are proposed: organisation/brand-as-container; management-as-container; supervision-as-container and theory/praxis-as-container. This research has uncovered some important challenges facing the community of practitioners in Australia. It is the contention in this paper that they need to be addressed if the practice of consulting with a systems psychodynamic approach is to flourish and continue to grow.
Stichworte: Beratung durch Fachleute, Psychodynamik, Kooperation, Theoretische Orientierung, Berater, Teams, Beratung, Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie
Keywords: Professional Consultation, Psychodynamics, Cooperation, Theoretical Orientation, Counselors, Teams, Counseling, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Abstract:
This paper is based upon the findings from my Phd Research completed in 2007. The research project was designed to explore and describe the experience of working with a systems psychodynamic approach from the consultants’ perspectives within the Australian context. To this end, 20 consultants who self-selected as working with a systems psychodynamic approach were involved. While the first intention of the research was to document the unique aspects of this approach, the findings uncovered a disturbing contradiction. 18 of 20 consultants strongly asserted the importance of working with colleagues in pairs or teams when adopting a systems psychodynamic approach. However, at the time of interviewing, all 20 consultants were working alone and only three had immediate plans to work with others. An exploration of the reasons for this gap between beliefs about best practice and actual practice became the focus for the analysis of the research data. What is discovered through this analysis is that the reasons why consultants are predominantly choosing to work alone are likely to be complex and irreducible. An exploration of the issues that working together can surface for consultants who apply a systems psychodynamic approach is presented under four sub-topics: system domain issues; theory-related issues; interpersonal issues and intrapsychic issues. In this detailed analysis, what is revealed is an absence of »good enough« containment for the anxieties that are likely to be aroused when consultants work together. To this end, four »containers « are proposed: organisation/brand-as-container; management-as-container; supervision-as-container and theory/praxis-as-container. This research has uncovered some important challenges facing the community of practitioners in Australia. It is the contention in this paper that they need to be addressed if the practice of consulting with a systems psychodynamic approach is to flourish and continue to grow.
Stichworte: Beratung durch Fachleute, Psychodynamik, Kooperation, Theoretische Orientierung, Berater, Teams, Beratung, Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie
Keywords: Professional Consultation, Psychodynamics, Cooperation, Theoretical Orientation, Counselors, Teams, Counseling, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Brigid NossalS. 11–30Kooperation in der Beratung: eine unmögliche Aufgabe? (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 11-30Peter BobackS. 31–49Motivieren durch Mobilisieren? Wie postmoderne Unternehmen das Engagement ihrer Mitarbeiter sichern (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 31-49Mark SteinS. 51–72Toxizität und das unbewusste Erleben des Körpers im Grenzbereich von Angestellten und Kunden (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 51-72Damian P. O'DohertyS. 73–90The Blur Sensation: Schatten (aus) der Zukunft (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 73-90Benjamin FaustS. 91–107»Damit mich nie wieder ein Mensch vergisst!« - Über die sozialpsychologischen Ursachen von School-Shootings am Beispiel des Amokläufers Bastian Bosse (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 91-107
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 11-30Peter BobackS. 31–49Motivieren durch Mobilisieren? Wie postmoderne Unternehmen das Engagement ihrer Mitarbeiter sichern (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 31-49Mark SteinS. 51–72Toxizität und das unbewusste Erleben des Körpers im Grenzbereich von Angestellten und Kunden (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 51-72Damian P. O'DohertyS. 73–90The Blur Sensation: Schatten (aus) der Zukunft (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 73-90Benjamin FaustS. 91–107»Damit mich nie wieder ein Mensch vergisst!« - Über die sozialpsychologischen Ursachen von School-Shootings am Beispiel des Amokläufers Bastian Bosse (PDF)
Freie Assoziation 2009, 12(1), 91-107